Have
you recently bought a house, or sold shares in a company, or maybe sent money
overseas? If so, I suspect that the experience has left you wondering why these
simple transactions take so much time and cost so much money. In each case,
what looks like a simple financial transaction takes place over many days via a
complex web of interactions between many parties. For example, let’s say that I
want to send some money to my mom in India. The way it works today, the money
passes through several overseas banks, linked together by so-called
“correspondence banking” arrangements, before it shows up in her account. This
process takes days, with fees pile up along the way. Such circuitous, expensive
and often risky financial transactions are what my team at IBM Research, and
our partners at the Linux Foundation want to flip on its head with blockchain.
Blockchain
is an emerging platform for transaction services that will fundamentally change
the way we do business in many industries. Blockchain technology has the potential to radically transform
multi-party business networks, enabling significantly faster, less expensive, lower
risk transactions and innovative
new business models.
Blockchain
is an append-only, shared ledger of digitally signed and encrypted transactions
that is replicated across a peer network of nodes. Cryptography is used to
ensure that participants have visibility only into information in the ledger
that they are authorized to see. The copies of the ledger across the peer nodes
are kept in sync by running a coordination protocol called the “consensus”
algorithm. Transactions once committed onto the ledger can never be changed
since no node can unilaterally change its copy of the ledger; i.e.,
participants cannot rewrite history or deny past transactions.
Going
back to my earlier money transfer example, if both my bank and my mother’s bank
kept their accounts on the blockchain, then one could have an instantaneous,
low-cost transaction that just involves the two banks and yet is invisible to
all other participants who have access to the blockchain.
Another
interesting capability of the blockchain is that you can attach business logic
to the transactions. This so-called “smart contracts” capability allows one to
model and automate business processes. To see how this can be useful let’s take
an example of international trade: a US retailer wants to buy a Chinese toy
manufacturer’s teddy bears. The latter wants to get paid before shipping the teddy
bears. The former wants to pay after inspecting the received teddy bears. Today,
banks step in as trust intermediaries to close this gap. Banks vouch for the
retailer by extending a line of credit – a letter-of-credit – based on which
the manufacturer ships the goods, and the payment happens when the goods are
received.
The
entire end-to-end trade process involves many participants: the exporter, the
importer, the exporter’s bank, the importer’s bank, shipping companies, and
customs officials, as well as complex, often manual interactions involving many
documents, making everything expensive and time consuming. With blockchain, the
business logic of the process can be coded as a smart contract and executed
automatically, leading to reduced cost, increased speed and reduced risk in
international trade.
44,000 lines of code and
counting
Much has been made of the
44,000 lines of code IBM has put toward the Linux Foundation’s Hyperledger Project. My team has been developing several key algorithms, with many more on its way, for this project. For example, we have developed a new consensus algorithm, called Sieve, tailored to specific blockchain use cases. Cryptographers at our labs in Almaden and Zurich have implemented an identity management service built with the latest in cryptography. A key capability of this service is user transactional privacy (anonymity and unlinkability of transactions). We have also implemented fine-grained privacy and confidentiality control that allows authors of smart contracts to precisely specify both who can view them and who can execute them.
Let’s
go back to those teddy bears. Using a blockchain, the manufacturer and retailer
may only know that money and goods exchanged – but otherwise they only see
digital signatures that customs and shipping met their agreements. Likewise,
customs and shipping may not know how much the entire transaction cost. More
importantly, none of the competitors of the manufacturer can infer from the
blockchain about this trade. These “smart” contracts sit on the blockchain,
with each participant only seeing and signing the part that pertains to their
role.
New services, new roles
with blockchain
Blockchain
technology is viewed by many businesses as both a threat and an opportunity.
Without a doubt, blockchain will disintermediate some roles in the financial
services sector. For example, the days of overseas payments going through long
chains of intermediaries are nearly over. At the same time there is a huge
opportunity to reimagine businesses using the shared ledger and smart contract
capabilities of the blockchain, leading to new services. Back to the
international trade example: once the state of the trade is captured on the
blockchain, it opens up a whole world of new possibilities. IoT-enabled events
could trigger fractional payments depending on the location of the goods in
transit. For instance, when the teddy bears are half way to their destination,
50 percent of the payment is made.
And
as I mentioned, the immense data from ledgers that can’t change or be deleted
is a great source of opportunity to apply cognitive computing. I’m looking
forward to the new roles that could emerge. One thing is for certain, whether
sending money to a relative in another country, or moving goods internationally,
blockchain will make things faster, cheaper and more transparent – which is a
good thing.
IBM
Research is hosting a blockchain workshop in Chicago. If you’d like to learn
more visit
this Web site.
Fantastic article, Ramesh. Thanks.
ReplyDeleteHi Ramesh, thanks for sharing a very insightful use of blockchain. It gave a very good understanding where all this budding concept could help improve the speed, cost and security of financial transactions.
ReplyDeleteRamesh, thanks for sharing. The examples help make this easily understandable.
ReplyDeleteIs it not a legal requirement that Customs should know what is the financial amount involved in a transaction? If only buyer and seller know the amount, how will customs/shipping ensure compliance? - Hari
ReplyDeleteHi Ramesh, nice post - I just would like to confirm about the existing rules of Central Bank on those Global transactions that involve exchange rate and taxes. The Blockchain are current build to support those rules? Thanks in Advance.
ReplyDelete